<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Special Education Today &#187; United States Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://specialeducationtoday.com/category/united-states-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://specialeducationtoday.com</link>
	<description>Current Content about Education of Students with Disabilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural Safeguards The Series &#8211; Part IV</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/tk4KegCWsY4/procedural-safeguards-series-part-iv.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/tk4KegCWsY4/procedural-safeguards-series-part-iv.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent educational evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://specialeducationtoday.com/?guid=ed39098f8b1f5194d8a20c55f22f5903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jim Gerl over on Special Education Law Blog. Image via WikipediaThis is the&#160;fourth installment in a multi-part series on procedural safeguards under the federal special education law, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. I work a lot in this &#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/tk4KegCWsY4/procedural-safeguards-series-part-iv.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/404062341206742692/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural Safeguards &#8211; The Series &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/Lz7YTLi8Os8/procedural-safeguards-series-part-i.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/Lz7YTLi8Os8/procedural-safeguards-series-part-i.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Appropriate Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individuals with Disabilities Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedural safeguards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://specialeducationtoday.com/?guid=c20caf23022bfa21f9800e4f9f9796d6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jim Gerl over on Special Education Law Blog. Image via WikipediaThis is the first installment in a multi-part series on procedural safeguards under the federal special education law, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.&#160; I work a lot in &#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/Lz7YTLi8Os8/procedural-safeguards-series-part-i.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3571240216539337304/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can There Be a Middle Ground on the FAPE Standard?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/ac7BrBXZGZ8/can-there-be-middle-ground-on-fape.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/ac7BrBXZGZ8/can-there-be-middle-ground-on-fape.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Appropriate Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Clay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individuals with Disabilities Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jim Gerl over on Special Education Law Blog. Image via WikipediaOne of the main guarantees of the special education law, IDEA, is that a child with a disability is entitled to a free and appropriate public education, or "FAPE."&#160;&#160; &#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/ac7BrBXZGZ8/can-there-be-middle-ground-on-fape.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/433461817532790580/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural safeguards The Series &#8211; Part VI</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/vkZpLCMKAGw/procedural-safeguards-series-part-vi.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/vkZpLCMKAGw/procedural-safeguards-series-part-vi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individualized Education Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia
This is the&#160;sixth installment in a multi-part series on procedural safeguards under the federal special education law, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. I work a lot in this area, so it is near and dear to my hea... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/vkZpLCMKAGw/procedural-safeguards-series-part-vi.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4877831119876267576/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Changes to §504: Do They Affect Special Education &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/pNcge9e_H3k/big-changes-to-504-do-they-affect.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/pNcge9e_H3k/big-changes-to-504-do-they-affect.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[§504]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaAs my summer rock tour on special education law continues, one theme is emerging: there have been big changes to §504 (through the ADA amendments by Congress.)  The big question is how much these changes will affect the education of... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/pNcge9e_H3k/big-changes-to-504-do-they-affect.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8420846322019066218/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Stevens and Special Education Law &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/oLq191aG1d8/justice-stevens-and-special-education_22.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/oLq191aG1d8/justice-stevens-and-special-education_22.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paul Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaJustice John Paul Stevens has announced his retirement from the United States Supreme Court.  Although originally considered a moderate by most, he has drifted to the liberal wing as the court added more and more very conservative ju... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/oLq191aG1d8/justice-stevens-and-special-education_22.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1396389958653143247/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U S Supreme Court Declines Review of Two Special Ed Cases</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/E7GyVGqFnlc/u-s-supreme-court-declines-review-of.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/E7GyVGqFnlc/u-s-supreme-court-declines-review-of.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United states Supreme Court has declined review of two special education cases.  The order denying "certiorari," or review, of the lower court decision may be found on pages 8 and 9 of this link.In LM, et al v. Capistrano Unified Sch Dist 538 F.3d ... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/E7GyVGqFnlc/u-s-supreme-court-declines-review-of.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/10/07/u-s-supreme-court-declines-review-of-two-special-ed-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on My IDEA Remedies Tour &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/l20Qiag7WuM/reflections-on-my-idea-remedies-tour.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/l20Qiag7WuM/reflections-on-my-idea-remedies-tour.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conference. Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some of you have noticed, I've had some fun describing my two speaking engagements last month as the IDEA Remedies Tour.  I spoke in early July at the Seattle University Academy for IDEA Hearing Officers  on the topic of compensatory education.  Lot... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/l20Qiag7WuM/reflections-on-my-idea-remedies-tour.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/08/15/reflections-on-my-idea-remedies-tour-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit Rules: Rowley Still Good Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/04_xdMDTELc/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/04_xdMDTELc/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit has confirmed what most of us had expected: the U. S Supreme Court decision in Rowley, et al v. Board of Education   553 IDImage via WikipediaELR 656, is still good law.At the trial level, the U. ... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/04_xdMDTELc/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/08/11/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CORRECTION: The Bad Economy and the Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/IMeghl58J_Y/correction-bad-economy-and-law.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/IMeghl58J_Y/correction-bad-economy-and-law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some alert readers have pointed out.  My recent post on the bad economy and the law contained a serious typographical error.  I left out the word "not."  Yes, that is a very bad error.In my discussion of the decision by the United States Supreme Cou... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/IMeghl58J_Y/correction-bad-economy-and-law.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/07/29/correction-the-bad-economy-and-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

