<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Special Education Today &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://specialeducationtoday.com/category/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://specialeducationtoday.com</link>
	<description>Current Content about Education of Students with Disabilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Rowley Standard for FAPE &#8211; Are the Bullying Cases Changing the Standard? Part II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/mIOQQUhDg5A/rowley-standard-for-fape-are-bullying_24.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/mIOQQUhDg5A/rowley-standard-for-fape-are-bullying_24.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Appropriate Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://specialeducationtoday.com/?guid=0fce30b391812dd20052b62be4beac49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jim Gerl over on Special Education Law Blog. No Bullying sign - School in Racine, Wisconsin (Photo credit: Wikipedia) We have interrupted our series on Bullying because a light bulb flicked on. (For the smart alecs out there, yes &#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/mIOQQUhDg5A/rowley-standard-for-fape-are-bullying_24.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7276792960182743764/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rowley Standard for FAPE &#8211; Are the Bullying Cases Changing the Standard? Part I</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/KHPap018hig/rowley-standard-for-fape-are-bullying.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/KHPap018hig/rowley-standard-for-fape-are-bullying.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Appropriate Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individuals with Disabilities Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://specialeducationtoday.com/?guid=07a036fb08e39f958006917b5c6bfb4d</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jim Gerl over on Special Education Law Blog. The Supreme Court of the United States. Washington, D.C. Français : La Cour suprême des États-Unis. Washington D.C., États-Unis. ‪Norsk (bokmål)â€¬: Høyesterett i USA. Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) This is &#8230; <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/KHPap018hig/rowley-standard-for-fape-are-bullying.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2820557065331959401/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Politics and Disability Laws Collide</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/SP6UufSVK3o/when-politics-and-disability-laws.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/SP6UufSVK3o/when-politics-and-disability-laws.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political action committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaHere's a question: Do you think that disability laws and political activism are compatible?Apparently a new Disability Power and Pride Political Action Committee has been formed.  Here is an article on the topic from Disability Scoop... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/SP6UufSVK3o/when-politics-and-disability-laws.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7775073536733995419/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Everybody Hates Special Education Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/4640Cfyrux0/why-everybody-hates-special-education.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/4640Cfyrux0/why-everybody-hates-special-education.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image by lauromaia via FlickrI was giving a presentation last month and one of the participants yelled out, "but we still don't have an answer."  This took me by surprise inasmuch as there is rarely an "answer" in special education law.  To explain my ... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/4640Cfyrux0/why-everybody-hates-special-education.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5335745364428524274/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Education Law 101 &#8211; Part II Revisited</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/cHwpD2xhdPM/special-education-law-101-part-ii.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/cHwpD2xhdPM/special-education-law-101-part-ii.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Appropriate Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Least Restrictive Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaBeginning last week, I have been running a repeat series I wrote a few years ago on the basics of special education law, with a few updates as appropriate.  This is part two. Today's post is on the requirement of the least restrictiv... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/cHwpD2xhdPM/special-education-law-101-part-ii.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7310562570045465490/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Education Law 101-  Part I Revistied</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/l5H3w1nGVqs/special-education-law-101-part-i.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/l5H3w1nGVqs/special-education-law-101-part-i.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Appropriate Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individuals with Disabilities Education Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaIn a recent post, I mentioned that I wanted to rerun a previous series on the basics of special ed law, with a handful of updates .  Here goes:People often ask me what "FAPE" and "IEP" mean. This is a good question. At a  conference ... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/l5H3w1nGVqs/special-education-law-101-part-i.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4200240792061581306/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Stevens and Special Education Law &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/oLq191aG1d8/justice-stevens-and-special-education_22.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/oLq191aG1d8/justice-stevens-and-special-education_22.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paul Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaJustice John Paul Stevens has announced his retirement from the United States Supreme Court.  Although originally considered a moderate by most, he has drifted to the liberal wing as the court added more and more very conservative ju... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/oLq191aG1d8/justice-stevens-and-special-education_22.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1396389958653143247/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Votes for This Clown?  Virginia Legislator Refers to Kids with Disabilities as a Curse.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/525T0MNn4fo/who-votes-for-this-clown-virginia.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/525T0MNn4fo/who-votes-for-this-clown-virginia.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporal punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Del. Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vengeance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaOne has to wonder about our electoral system.  Exactly how does a person get elected to public office?  I have read a lot recently about the Supreme Court's extreme judicial activism in relation to its shredding of the campaign finan... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/525T0MNn4fo/who-votes-for-this-clown-virginia.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7547255204493440013/comments/default</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit Rules: Rowley Still Good Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/04_xdMDTELc/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/04_xdMDTELc/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAPE standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit has confirmed what most of us had expected: the U. S Supreme Court decision in Rowley, et al v. Board of Education   553 IDImage via WikipediaELR 656, is still good law.At the trial level, the U. ... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/04_xdMDTELc/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/08/11/9th-circuit-rules-rowley-still-good-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CORRECTION: The Bad Economy and the Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/IMeghl58J_Y/correction-bad-economy-and-law.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/IMeghl58J_Y/correction-bad-economy-and-law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some alert readers have pointed out.  My recent post on the bad economy and the law contained a serious typographical error.  I left out the word "not."  Yes, that is a very bad error.In my discussion of the decision by the United States Supreme Cou... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/IMeghl58J_Y/correction-bad-economy-and-law.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/07/29/correction-the-bad-economy-and-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

