<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Special Education Today &#187; school special education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://specialeducationtoday.com/category/school-special-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://specialeducationtoday.com</link>
	<description>Current Content about Education of Students with Disabilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:25:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Results In; We&#8217;re Back in First Place</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/s52uSQ4iTyc/poll-results-in-were-back-in-first.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/s52uSQ4iTyc/poll-results-in-were-back-in-first.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bloggers choice awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school special education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a part of the fun component of the special education law  blog, we run a poll on the lefthand side of the blog.  These are not scientific endeavors, and we do not pretend that the results resemble science in any way.  Nonetheless, we think that they... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/s52uSQ4iTyc/poll-results-in-were-back-in-first.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/11/07/poll-results-in-were-back-in-first-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disability Statistics: All in One Place</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/5xuG6JXHqsI/disability-statistics-all-in-one-place.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/5xuG6JXHqsI/disability-statistics-all-in-one-place.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school special education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People often ask me about statistics.  Sometimes even in combination with a lawyer joke.If you're like me, it is hard to keep numbers at your fingertips.  Don't get me wrong, I loved mathematics;  I even took calculus.  I just hate arithmetic (the actu... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/5xuG6JXHqsI/disability-statistics-all-in-one-place.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/10/26/disability-statistics-all-in-one-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on the IDEA Remedies Tour: The Nature of Compensatory Education</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/1mREyoDu_u0/reflections-on-idea-remedies-tour.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/1mREyoDu_u0/reflections-on-idea-remedies-tour.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school special education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second in a multiple part series of posts on my IDEA Remedies Tour, the joking name I gave to my presentations this summer on the major remedies available when the parent/student prevails in an IDEA due process hearing or appeal. I really l... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/1mREyoDu_u0/reflections-on-idea-remedies-tour.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/08/18/reflections-on-the-idea-remedies-tour-the-nature-of-compensatory-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Supreme Court Decision- Part IV (Hearing Officer Authority)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/BU3oMofZ2tw/new-supreme-court-decision-part-iv.html</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/BU3oMofZ2tw/new-supreme-court-decision-part-iv.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gerl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school special education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unilateral placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who follow this blog know that I was concerned about the school district's argument that hearing officers lacked authority to grant reimbursement.  I had never heard this argument made before.  NOTE: I have a bias here, I am a due process ... <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SpecialEducationLawBlog/~3/BU3oMofZ2tw/new-supreme-court-decision-part-iv.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://specialeducationtoday.com/2009/07/02/new-supreme-court-decision-part-iv-hearing-officer-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

